Implementation vs. Construction
Traditional and modular data centers represent entirely different approaches to execution. This is because traditional data centers are built with fully customized masonry, which requires significant time and resources.
In contrast, a modular data center offers greater flexibility, scalability, and efficiency. Since it consists of prefabricated modules that can be implemented, or even removed, incrementally as needed, it allows for easy and quick resizing of processing and storage capacity.
When it comes to construction, the scenario is different. Any expansion process is naturally longer and more complex, as seen with traditional data centers. Expanding or updating a traditional data center is intricate and can involve significant service interruptions.
For comparison, if a traditional data center takes a year to be built, the modular approach can cut that time in half, completing implementation in just 6 months, representing a 50% schedule optimization.
Parallel vs. Linear
The implementation of a modular data center significantly differs from the construction of a traditional data center in terms of process and execution time. While the traditional follows a linear approach, sequencing project stages (or design), foundation work, shell construction, and finally equipment installation and commissioning, the modular approach is different. It runs activities in parallel.