Modular vs. Traditional Data Centers: A Direct Comparison
Implementation vs. Construction
Traditional and modular data centers represent fundamentally different approaches when it comes to implementation. This is because a traditional data center is a brick-and-mortar, 100% customized construction, which demands significant time and resources.
The modular data center, on the other hand, offers greater flexibility, scalability, and efficiency.
This is because it consists of prefabricated modules that can be deployed—or even removed—incrementally as needed, allowing processing and storage capacity to be scaled easily and rapidly.]
However, when it comes to construction, the scenario is different. Any expansion process is naturally longer and more complex, as is the case with traditional data centers. Expanding or upgrading a traditional data center is an intricate process and can involve significant service disruptions.
As a point of comparison, if a traditional data center takes a year to build, the modular approach can reduce that time by half, completing the deployment in just 6 months. This represents a 50% optimization of the schedule.
Parallel vs. Linear
The deployment of a modular data center is fundamentally different from building a traditional one, both in its process and execution time. The traditional method is linear, with sequential phases for design, foundation work, shell construction, and finally, the installation and commissioning of equipment. The modular approach, in contrast, runs on parallel workflows.